1917: Revolution as Demobilization and State Collapse

Our essay proposes that while the predominant concept of revolution as driven by the mobilization of social, political, and cultural forces has value, at least as important for understanding the revolutions of 1917 was the dramatic demobilization of army, police, state, and society. We suggest that revolutions often see a conflict between affective mobilization (in which some portion of the citizenry becomes much more enthusiastic about particular social and political projects) and structural demobilization (in which the failure of major state institutions and economic enterprises makes positive social and political change nearly impossible). In early 1917, affective mobilization on behalf of the war and the regime was in decline, but structural mobilization was at its peak. The February Revolution brought a sudden radical structural demobilization. This structural demobilization both made it possible for relatively modest numbers of revolutionary forces to succeed in October 1917 and made the emergence of widespread apathy and disillusionment in 1918 much more likely.

Title	1917: Revolution as Demobilization and State Collapse
Creator	Sanborn, Joshua A.
Creator	Lohr, E.
Publisher	Slavic Review
Academic Department	History
Division	Social Sciences
Organization	Lafayette College
Date Issued	2017
Date Available	2023-06-20
Type	Article
Language	English
Bibliographic Citation	Lohr, E. and J. A. Sanborn (2017) "1917: Revolution as Demobilization and State Collapse." Slavic Review 76 (3): 703-709.
Standard Identifier	DOI 10.1017/slr.2017.178
Standard Identifier	Handle 10385/6q182m725
Permalink	http://hdl.handle.net/10385/6q182m725
Rights Statement	In Copyright
Rights Holders	Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies